I don't know why, but when it comes to cheesy horror movies I'm a modern era snob. Try to introduce me to a low-budget horror movie from 2015 and odds are I won't care to view it. Find me a low-budget horror movie from 1977 and I'll buy the popcorn. Honestly, I think the old crap is a lot better than the new crap. Yet that isn't always the case and films like Shock Waves stand as proof of that. Now, I knew that Shock Waves was either going to be bad or "so bad that it's good" going in, but one of my fellow horror fanatics is really keen on this particular nazi zombie flick and that gave me high hopes. He was wrong. I was misled. I'm sorry, Peter Cushing, but Shock Waves is a lousy movie. Before we start discussing things that the movie didn't do well, let's talk about areas where Shock Waves managed to succeed. Well, . . . that was a short list. No, seriously, they cast Peter Cushing and the atmosphere was a bit charged at times, though that probably happened by accident. The sets are cool, though the fact that the camera was apparently operated by an orangutan makes it hard to enjoy the locations. I'm assuming the director was drunk because I want to give him the benefit of the doubt. The editor must have gone missing long before he finished his work with the picture. The score could only be deemed impressive if it had been provided by small children. On a similar note, the effects could only be deemed impressive if they had been provided by small children wearing blindfolds. If there was a movie about people having to sit down and watch Shock Waves, that movie would be far more frightening than Shock Waves. Seriously, if you're thinking about watching Shock Waves, I implore you to take your copy of the movie and toss into the depths where it belongs. In fact, I should have given it the Spinal Tap treatment. Hell, it's not too late--here's my alternate review of Shock Waves: "Shit Waves."
Final Grade: F-
Final Grade: F-
|This is what will happen to you if you ignore my advice and watch Shock Waves.|