Oh shit, son! You have just entered another dimension, a dimension not only of text and pictures, but of madness. You have embarked on a journey into a lunatic's mind. Check your sanity at the door--you're in the Land of Way!
Showing posts with label sci-fi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sci-fi. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Short Attention Span Review: Flash Gordon (1980)
Short Attention Span Review: Flash Gordon (1980)
I don't think I can be objective here, but maybe I don't need to be. I don't really know, to be completely honest with you You see, I'm not sure that there is a greater paradox in the realm of the motion picture than Flash Gordon. It is entirely possible that this is a "so bad it's good" sort of movie. There are definitely a few bits at the very least that would have wound up on the cutting room floor if the powers that be were looking to create a genuine classic with this brazen affair. However, there is also a sense of majesty paired with some splendid entertainment value that elevates this colorful and quixotic gem. In terms of sheer enjoyment, it is hard to top, and despite some clunky performances and a few goofy moments courtesy of the FX or the plotting, it does many things amazingly well. The color palette is a true splendor, and the score is a genuine masterpiece courtesy of Queen, bolstered by a main theme that is nothing short of sheer perfection. The excitement is non-stop, and the stakes are incredibly high. The heroes are lovable and the villains are despicable, and anyone who doesn't smile while they partake of this feast for the senses is dead inside. And yet there are those wooden performances and those moments where you can't quite tell if the filmmakers are going for camp or simply missing the mark by a mile. It is cheeky. It is downright silly. And somewhere, deep down inside, your inner critic is bound to feel that the material is beneath you. But then it soars and despite your misgivings, you find yourself being blown away by all the energy and grandeur, and somehow the sappy plot gets under your skin. Then you're actually moved by this barrage of sight and sound that is a lot like a puppy: awkward, a little smelly, and 100% lovable. It's Flash Gordon. It could be terrible. It could be the greatest sci-fi adventure of all time. You're free to make your own call, but as for me, . . . well, it's the first movie I really remember seeing, at a drive-in no less. I have loved it for as long as I have loved the movies. Yes, it's true--I like Flash as much as Mark Wahlberg and Ted do. Maybe more.
Final Grade: A
Labels:
#Flash,
#FlashGordon,
#movies,
#sciencefiction,
#scifi,
#Ted,
1980,
80s,
action,
classic,
cult classic,
Flash,
Flash Gordon,
Gordon,
Max Von Sydow,
movies,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
Ted
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
Top 20 Horror Movies - #15) Suspiria (1977)
One of the things that I'm doing this month as I celebrate Halloween here in the Land of Way is taking the time to rank my Top 20 Horror Movies and my Top 20 Horror Novels.
Note:
I want to be clear that I'm basing these choices on my own humble opinion. I'm not trying to rank these movies in accordance with their place in pop culture, but I'm offering up my take on the best horror films that I have ever watched and enjoyed. There are some familiar candidates that I consider to be great pictures that didn't make the cut because there wasn't room, and there are some films that are widely regarded as great pictures that didn't make the cut because I feel that they are overrated. There are also a few instances where it was difficult to determine whether or not a movie belonged to the horror genre (I said "no" to Aliens but "yes" to Jaws), and it may also be worth noting that this is largely a modern list (as long as you're okay with my classification of modern as anything after 1960) that only features one lonely creature from the so-called "Classic Monsters" films produced by Universal Studios.
Thus far, the list includes:
#20) The Fly (1986)
#19) The Howling (1981)
#18) Night of the Living Dead (1968)
#17) Alien (1979)
#16) Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
So far, we've been hanging with monsters, werewolves, zombies, and aliens. Today, we keep the late 70s motif that started at #17 alive and invite some witches to the party.
Top 20 Horror Movies - #15) Suspiria (1977)
Suspiria, a gruesome nightmare that many consider the finest example of Italian horror, is one of two such pictures to make my list. The other is also directed by Dario Argento, a gifted filmmaker who spent much of the 70s and 80s churning out stunning motion pictures before descending into mediocrity in the 90s and beyond. This inventive yarn is a dark fairy tale of sorts, with a roving camera and a bold color palette which give the picture a surreal tone that is positively enchanting. The score by Goblin is one of the most striking scores that the horror genre has ever been blessed with, and the bloody effects work is top-notch. The script is simple but effective; Jessica Harper's Suzy Bannion travels to a prestigious dance school where something is seriously amiss. After a number of grisly murders occur and our heroine starts to investigate some spooky shenanigans taking place, Suzy discovers that the academy is merely a front for a coven of witches. Argento was at his peak here, and the ominous atmosphere and the outright terror that he is able to conjure up throughout this fascinating picture is damn impressive. Some of the kills in this movie are incredibly disturbing, and there are a handful of less violent sequences in the mix that are ridiculously creepy. The cast performs well, with Harper giving her best performance and genre vet Udo Kier popping up in a brief but welcome part. Despite his recent misfires, of which there are many, I still consider Dario Argento a legend in the realm of horror cinema for his incredible body of work--and Suspiria undoubtedly ranks among his very best. In fact, while I favor another picture (those who follow my blog closely are already aware of this, but the rest of you will have to wait and see), most probably consider this to be his greatest achievement.
![]() |
| I'm not sure which of Suspiria's potent assets is more impressive, Dario's deft camera work or the surreal color palette. |
Labels:
#Alien,
#Halloween,
#horror,
#Suspiria,
#witches,
action,
Alien,
Argento,
Body Snatchers,
coven,
giallo,
halloween,
horror,
night of the living dead,
NOTLD,
sci-fi,
Suspiria,
Udo Kier,
witches
Monday, October 12, 2015
Top 20 Horror Movies - #16) Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
One of the things that I'm doing this month as I celebrate Halloween here in the Land of Way is taking the time to rank my Top 20 Horror Movies and my Top 20 Horror Novels.
Note:
I want to be clear that I'm basing these choices on my own humble opinion. I'm not trying to rank these movies in accordance with their place in pop culture, but I'm offering up my take on the best horror films that I have ever watched and enjoyed. There are some familiar candidates that I consider to be great pictures that didn't make the cut because there wasn't room, and there are some films that are widely regarded as great pictures that didn't make the cut because I feel that they are overrated. There are also a few instances where it was difficult to determine whether or not a movie belonged to the horror genre (I said "no" to Aliens but "yes" to Jaws), and it may also be worth noting that this is largely a modern list (as long as you're okay with my classification of modern as anything after 1960) that only features one lonely creature from the so-called "Classic Monsters" films produced by Universal Studios.
Thus far, the list includes:
#20) The Fly (1986)
#19) The Howling (1981)
#18) Night of the Living Dead (1968)
#17) Alien (1979)
For my last selection, we journeyed to outer space. This time, alien spores designed for global domination are going to save us the trip.
Top 20 Horror Movies - #16) Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
The second of three remakes to grace my list is a creepy sci-fi/horror hybrid that greatly improves upon the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers from 1956, which was a damn good movie itself. This creepy affair has a stellar cast and impressive effects, and Phillip Kaufman showed a deft touch with his direction. In particular, Kaufman did a great job of utilizing the city of San Francisco as the setting and capturing some really wonderful images of the alien spores that threaten our heroes. The plot is obviously a real winner; we've seen a couple of different versions of the same story since this remake was released, and there are a number of other films that are clearly imitations of this sinister saga as envisioned by the author of the source novel, Jack Finney. Things start slowly, but soon paranoia gives way to outright terror as our weary players struggle to survive, wondering who they can trust and who has already been replaced. Donald Sutherland and Brooke Adams are outstanding in the lead roles. The supporting cast includes Leonard Nimoy, Jeff Goldblum, Veronica Cartwright, and Art Hindle, and Kevin McCarthy (the star of the 1956 version) briefly pops up in a significant cameo. I like the score from Denny Zeitlin and I really like the way that this Invasion of the Body Snatchers slowly builds to a terrifying crescendo. The last scene is a genuine shocker, and as many times as this tale has been brought to the screen, there can be no doubt that this is the best version. It remains one of my favorite horror films, and it is certainly deserving of the #16 spot on my list.
![]() |
| This stellar remake benefits from groovy effects, a sinister mood, and an awesome cast. |
Labels:
#Alien,
#Halloween,
#horror,
action,
Alien,
Body Snatchers,
halloween,
horror,
Invasion of the Body Snatchers,
Leonard Nimoy,
night of the living dead,
NOTLD,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
space,
Sutherland
Friday, October 9, 2015
Top 20 Horror Movies - #17) Alien (1979)
One of the things that I'm doing this month as I celebrate Halloween here in the Land of Way is taking the time to rank my Top 20 Horror Movies and my Top 20 Horror Novels.
Note:
I want to be clear that I'm basing these choices on my own humble opinion. I'm not trying to rank these movies in accordance with their place in pop culture, but I'm offering up my take on the best horror films that I have ever watched and enjoyed. There are some familiar candidates that I consider to be great pictures that didn't make the cut because there wasn't room, and there are some films that are widely regarded as great pictures that didn't make the cut because I feel that they are overrated. There are also a few instances where it was difficult to determine whether or not a movie belonged to the horror genre (I said "no" to Aliens but "yes" to Jaws), and it may also be worth noting that this is largely a modern list (as long as you're okay with my classification of modern as anything after 1960) that only features one lonely creature from the so-called "Classic Monsters" films produced by Universal Studios.
Thus far, the list includes:
#20) The Fly (1986)
#19) The Howling (1981)
#18) Night of the Living Dead (1968)
Now, we turn our attention to space as I unveil the next movie on my list.
Top 20 Horror Movies - #17) Alien (1979)
First off, I want to say that I do believe that Alien is a stellar horror film. Secondly, I will acknowledge that I think that this film's sequel, Aliens, is a much better picture. However, Alien made my list and Aliens will not. Why? Well, Alien is a horror film, but I think Aliens is a bit more like Predator. Is it a science fiction movie? Is it an action movie? I'm not sure, but despite the presence of some horrifying content, Aliens just doesn't feel like a horror movie to me. Alien, on the other hand, is most certainly worthy of a spot on this list. It's not a thrill ride with guns blazing, it's a subdued tale of terror that relies more on escalating tension and big scares than escalating machismo and big explosions. The mood and the sets are incredible, the effects are totally convincing, and the cast is superb. Sigourney Weaver's work here made her a star, and she is backed by talented performers like Tom Skerrit, John Hurt, and Yaphet Kotto, among others. There isn't a wealth of gore, but the scene where the alien bursts out of John Hurt's chest is one of the most disturbing sequences that the horror genre has ever produced. The design work by H. R. Giger is one of the picture's biggest assets and Ridley Scott's direction is splendid. Alien is bolstered by one of Jerry Goldsmith's finest scores and the sceenplay from Dan O-Bannon is terrific. In short, Alien is a gripping horror film that fires on all cylinders thanks to the presence and the efforts of a first-rate cast and crew. It remains the best horror film set in space (though Event Horizon is pretty damn scary too) and I am pleased to include it on my list.
![]() |
| In addition to being a great flick, Alien also boasts one of the most gut-wrenching scenes in the history of horror movies. |
Labels:
#Alien,
#Halloween,
#horror,
action,
Alien,
Aliens,
Giger,
H. R. Giger,
halloween,
horror,
night of the living dead,
NOTLD,
Predator,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
Sigourney Weaver,
space,
the fly,
The Howling,
thriller
Friday, October 2, 2015
Top 20 Horror Movies - #20) The Fly (1986)
One of the things that I'm doing this month as I celebrate Halloween here in the Land of Way is taking the time to rank my Top 20 Horror Movies and my Top 20 Horror Novels. Today, I'm cranking things up with the first entry in my Top 20 Horror Movies.
Note:
I want to be clear that I'm basing these choices on my own humble opinion. I'm not trying to rank these movies in accordance with their place in pop culture, but I'm offering up my take on the best horror films that I have ever watched and enjoyed. There are some familiar candidates that I consider to be great pictures that didn't make the cut because there wasn't room, and there are some films that are widely regarded as great pictures that didn't make the cut because I feel that they are overrated. There are also a few instances where it was difficult to determine whether or not a movie belonged to the horror genre (I said "no" to Aliens but "yes" to Jaws), and it may also be worth noting that this is largely a modern list (as long as you're okay with my classification of modern as anything after 1960) that only features one lonely creature from the so-called "Classic Monsters" films produced by Universal Studios.
Top 20 Horror Movies - #20) The Fly (1986)
The first entry on my list is one of three remakes to be included. This one is surely the wildest departure from the original, as this somber tale bears little or no resemblance to the cheeky Vincent Price vehicle from 1958. This 1986 version of the The Fly is directed by David Cronenberg, one of the most visionary directors of them all. Cronenberg's intense and often perverse work has largely originated within either the horror genre or the science fiction genre, and I think this deliberate terror yarn stands as his grandest achievement. It's also the best work that Jeff Goldblum has ever done, and his total immersion into the part of Seth Brundle, a daring and strangely charismatic scientist, is amazing to behold. Throw in some fabulous effects work and an eerie score by Howard Shore and you have the makings of a classic. This version of The Fly is a slow burn that works magnificently. The first two acts are largely about meeting the characters and witnessing a failed experiment and the subsequent transformation as Goldblum's wacky but lovable scientist becomes one of the most grotesque monsters ever put on film. These portions of the film are ripe with suspense and dread, while the third and final act is where most of the gruesome action takes place. The film is potent; the combination of disturbing visuals and difficult content make it every bit as emotional and dramatic as it is frightening. Yes, this version of The Fly is everything that I'm looking for in a great horror film, and viewing it remains a riveting experience that I highly recommend.
![]() |
| Jeff Goldblum's work in Cronenberg's remake of The Fly is absolutely amazing. |
Monday, September 21, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: Dreamscape (1984)
Dreamscape is the kind of whacko thrill ride that I can really get behind. The 80s were a good decade for silly films like this, and there are few sci-fi/horror/fantasy/action/political intrigue medleys that I enjoy as much as this one. Dennis Quaid is a great lead and David Patrick Kelly is a wonderful villain. Max Von Sydow and Christopher Plummer are also on hand, and Kate Capshaw and Eddie Albert are among the other performers who do a splendid job of bringing a wild script to life. The movie concerns scientific efforts to manipulate dreams that essentially result in the development of dream warriors who wield extraordinary power in their nocturnal adventures. This is troubling, as these dream warriors can invade the dreams of others. One is good, a likable psychic crook (Quaid) who finds purpose helping people dealing with traumatic nightmares. One is bad, a cold-blooded psycho (Kelly) who is soon working with a shady government official (Plummer) who wants him to kill the president. The dream sequences are unique and satisfying, and the movie mostly succeeds at the various things it attempts to accomplish. The horror and sci-fi elements work best, while the action bits frequently fall flat. Most importantly, Dreamscape requires Quaid to help a young boy who is menaced by Snake-Man (a groovy menace who appears thanks to a crafty combination of stop-motion animation and practical effects) in his nightmares. Snake-Man is equal parts cheese and classic goodness, and he's the coolest thing about Dreamscape, a goofy thriller that I really dig.
Final Grade: B+
![]() |
| Is Snake-Man the best thing about Dreamscape? Yes, I do believe that he is. |
Labels:
*80s,
#movies,
80s,
Dennis Quaid,
dream,
dreams,
Dreamscape,
fantasy,
horror,
Max Von Sydow,
movies,
nightmare,
nightmares,
Plummer,
Quaid,
review,
reviews,
sci-fi,
Snake-Man,
Von Sydow
Sunday, July 26, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: Critters (1986)
Unfairly labelled a Gremlins clone upon release, Critters is a quirky horror film with a talented cast and groovy special effects. It borrows from several movies but remains original and entertaining from start to finish. At times it is a little creepy, at times it is certainly thrilling, and there's a lot of humor sprinkled throughout. The plot finds a handful of alien furballs with lots of teeth terrorizing a likable family at their farm. There are a pair of alien bounty hunters who can look like anyone hot on the trail of these borderline cute/decidedly vicious furballs. The critters roll around and wreak havoc at the farm with glee, while the somewhat dimwitted and extremely destructive bounty hunters damn near ruin the entire town looking for them. The humans caught in the mix include Scott Grimes (who recently nailed a decent part on the final season of Justified) as Brad, a mischievous young boy who digs firecrackers. His mother and father are played by Dee Wallace Stone and Billy Green Bush, and they make the most of their parts. There's also Don Keith Opper as the crazy guy who helps out at the farm and the always reliable M. Emmet Walsh as the baffled sheriff. Those viewers who are expecting a bloody romp may be a bit disappointed with the minimal body count, but anyone expecting a lighthearted picture will be taken aback by the violence and language. It's a kooky flick and it may be underrated simply because it's hard to determine exactly what audience the filmmakers were aiming for. Critters is a bit too rough to be kiddie fare and many adults will find it too silly to enjoy. However, those who like a zany creature feature and anyone who shares my enthusiasm for 80s horror movies will have a blast with this one.
Final Grade: B+
Final Grade: B+
![]() |
| Dee Wallace Stone shows some range, going from loving mother to scared mother before finally arriving at angry mother/critter-slaying machine. |
Labels:
80s,
Aliens,
bounty hunters,
comedy,
creature feature,
creatures,
Critters,
Dee Wallace Stone,
Gremlins,
horror,
monster movie,
monsters,
movie,
movies,
scary,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
space
Monday, July 13, 2015
Short Attention Span Review - Machete Kills (2013)
The first Machete from 2010 was a dark and gruesome nod to hardcore 80s action films, which were equal parts hardcore and ludicrous. Need proof? Take another look at Stallone in Cobra, a film which is damn near as silly as anything Robert Rodriguez could ever dream up. Surprisingly, this sequel is more of a send-up of James Bond's sci-fi adventures--though the outer space intrigue is surely cross-pollinated with that 80s action vibe that the director is so fond of. Bolder, far more obnoxious, and ten times as absurd as its predecessor, Machete Kills is an utterly ridiculous motion picture that nearly crumbles under the weight of all the insanity splattered across the screen. Yet everyone involved is clearly having a blast, and viewers who don't expect anything more from Machete Kills than a goofy good time will surely be entertained. Note: if you're expecting something more from Machete Kills, that's a you-problem, not a Machete Kills-problem. I don't know where they found that Carlos Estevez guy, but he was awesome as the president, and Mel Gibson was a terrific villain. The best part in the picture may have belonged to Demian Bichir as a schizophrenic who constantly veers from noble good guy to crazed villain as his various personalities rage across the scene. Of course, Rodriguez has always been down with girl power, and Michelle Rodriguez and Amber Heard are both incredibly badass (and hot) in this action/sci-fi mash-up. The score is fantastic, the laughs are frequent, and while the picture is totally bonkers, it somehow manages to keep the viewer interested while gleefully going overboard with cartoonish violence and loads of gore. I loved Grindhouse, I dug Machete (was Fahey badass or what?), and Machete Kills was another fun flick from the modern master of grindhouse filmmaking.
Final Grade: B
Bonus Points: There was a brief homage to The Road Warrior that made me stand up and applaud.
Final Grade: B
Bonus Points: There was a brief homage to The Road Warrior that made me stand up and applaud.
![]() |
| Everyone has a good time in Machete Kills. |
Labels:
#Machete,
action,
cinema,
cult,
Danny Trejo,
El Rey,
In Space,
Machete,
Machete Kills,
mel gibson,
movie,
movies,
retro,
review,
Robert Rodriguez,
Rodriguez,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
Trejo
Monday, July 6, 2015
Short Attention Span Review - Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Since I recently reviewed the first two movies in the Terminator series, I decided to take another look at Terminator 3 this weekend. While it's vastly inferior to its predecessors, it's also vastly superior to Terminator: Salvation, and I do enjoy it. Some people probably hate all the humor, but that's one of my favorite things about this one. That and the ridiculous car chase. I'm not so keen on Nick Stahl as John Connor, though Claire Danes is always a joy to watch. I definitely think that Kristanna Loken killed it as the T-X, the anti-Terminator Terminator. The downbeat nature of the piece doesn't mesh well with Arnold constantly winking at the camera, and some of the later action scenes are a bit underwhelming. So Terminator 3 is a bit of a mixed bag and it never ventures anywhere near the greatness of The Terminator or T2, but Arnold does his job well and most of the action is worthwhile. It's not must-see entertainment, but fans of this sort of material should get a kick out of it.
Final Grade: C
Final Grade: C
![]() |
| He's back! |
Labels:
#Terminator,
action,
Arnold,
arnold schwarzenegger,
Genesys,
movie,
movies,
review,
Rise of the Machines,
Schwarzenegger,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
T2,
Terminator,
Terminator 2,
Terminator 3
Monday, May 18, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: The Terminator (1984)
As we gear up for a new entry in the the Terminator franchise, I took the time to revisit the 1984 thriller that started it all. The Terminator is my favorite entry in the series (T2 be damned) and it is still vastly entertaining some 30+ years after it hit the scene. I think it has more heart and soul than the first sequel, and though Robert Patrick was awesome, no one has topped Arnold's showstopping performance as the villainous machine the series is named after yet. Yes, T2 is amazing, and even if I don't agree, I understand where the people who think it improves upon the original are coming from. The third movie was okay, the fourth was pretty okay too, I guess, though it didn't seem to fit. This latest attempt at reviving the property looks pretty kickass, but I'm not here to speculate, I'm here to heap praise on Cameron's breakout hit. The Terminator is a lean picture with several stellar action setpieces and three noteworthy stars owning their parts while an able supporting cast rounds things out in style. Hell, Lance Henriksen is on hand in a true throwaway role, so you know The Terminator had talent to spare. Michael Biehn is a revelation as the gritty hero who is greatly outmatched, Linda Hamilton is fantastic in a tough role that requires a lot of emoting and physicality, and Arnold is a supreme badass. Who else could have played this part? Stan Winston's effects are stellar and surely played a pivotal role in The Terminator's success, but Arnold is the biggest special effect in the movie. Not only is his physical appearance so damn imposing, but he does a wonderful job with his lines and his handling of the various weapons he uses throughout the film is truly impressive. Everyone involved deserves a lot of credit, but this franchise was launched on Schwarzenegger's broad shoulders to tremendous effect. Whether you classify it as an action movie or a science-fiction thriller (it's actually both), this is a genuine classic.
Final Grade: A+
Final Grade: A+
![]() |
| He may not have played a villain often, but this superb action film proves that Arnold could nail such a roll when programmed to do so. |
Labels:
#Terminator,
#TerminatorGenisys,
80s,
action,
Arnold,
Biehn,
cameron,
Genisys,
Hamilton,
hit,
Judgment Day,
movie,
movies,
Schwarzenegger,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
T2,
Terminator,
The Terminator,
Winston
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: RoboCop (1987)
Earlier today I posted a review of the new RoboCop (I gave it a C) that you can read below. It only seemed logical to follow that up with a look at the original 1987 smash hit from visionary director Paul Verhoeven. Rest assured, good people, this one gets an A+. RoboCop is one of the best sci-fi/action mash-ups ever to grace the screen and I can't think of anything that it doesn't do well. Peter Weller leads an amazing cast that boasts wonderful performances from Nancy Allen, Ronny Cox, Kurtwood Smith, and Miguel Ferrer. Many of these talents offered up what was likely their best work in this excessively violent and riveting shoot 'em up with a lot of heart. It also benefits from a wealth of black humor and tremendous effects work. The story is engaging and provocative in equal measures and heightens the impact of all the bloody mayhem unfolding onscreen. Basil Poledouris provides the piece with what may be his second-best score (I'm hoping that no one reading this needs to be told what his finest score was) and the production team nailed every aspect of bringing this wild and visionary tale to life. I'm frequently amazed that this was such a major success, but that gives me hope for mankind. Apparently, there are lot of people out there who dig dark humor, gratuitous voilence, and buckets of gore. RoboCop is a true one-of-a-kind and it remains just as potent and daring now as it was then. Perhaps that's the biggest reason that I was so unimpressed with the reboot--RoboCop didn't need a paint job, and there was surely no need for a PG-13 RoboCop Lite. If you're in the mood for a badass movie about a badass cybernetic policeman cleaning up the mean streets of Detroit, look to 1987.
Final Grade: A+
Final Grade: A+
![]() |
| The original RoboCop is a special effects masterpiece. If you don't believe me, just ask this guy. |
Labels:
1987,
2014,
action,
classic,
Detroit,
excessive,
gore,
gratuitous,
movie,
movies,
new Robocop,
original,
Paul Verhoeven,
Peter Weller,
reboot,
review,
Robocop,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
violent
Short Attention Span Review: RoboCop (2014)
The original RoboCop from 1987 is a classic. Incredibly violent, incredibly funny, and incredibly distinct, its enduring popularity made it ripe for a reboot. So now we have the 2014 version of RoboCop, which is a decent action movie. In a way, it's a bit of a shame, because if I had sit down to watch this movie without ever having seen the original, maybe I would have been a bit more impressed. As it is, this loose interpretation of the Paul Verhoeven blockbuster hits a lot of the same beats, sports an impressive cast, benefits from stellar effects work, and still manages to fall a bit flat. It doesn't have the same heart and it doesn't have the same acidic wit--though it tries really hard on both counts. Now, to be fair, the lack of an R-rating probably makes it damn near impossible to compete with a legendary picture that is as violent and as gory an action film as you're apt to see. There are certainly times when this 2014 RoboCop feels more than a little watered-down, and some of the performers involved could have made a lot more noise if they had been working without boundaries. Yet it emerges as a serviceable thrill ride and the original was built on a strong enough concept that even a RoboCop Lite packs a bit of a punch. In the end, I was entertained by this one, but I wasn't as moved by it and I certainly didn't feel like I had just watched something fresh and exciting--though, to be fair, I don't know if that's even possible with these reboots that are so en vogue. Would I recommend it? I guess, but I would certainly recommend the original first.
Final Grade: C
Final Grade: C
![]() | |
| The new RoboCop certainly looks cool. |
Labels:
1987,
2014,
action movie,
blockbuster,
Gary Oldman,
Joel Kinnaman,
Michael Keaton,
movie,
movies,
new Robocop,
original,
Paul Verhoeven,
Peter Weller,
reboot,
review,
Robocop,
Samuel L. Jackson,
sci-fi,
Verhoeven
Monday, February 16, 2015
Cult Classics from Dimension X: The Omega Man (1971)
I can remember watching this as a small child. I know, I know, that explains a lot, right? I can also remember being fascinated by it even though my father insisted that it was lousy. As an adult, this is still one of the few movies that Pop and I disagree on. The Omega Man is a fantastic piece that is equal parts science fiction, horror, action, and thoughtful drama. Most importantly, it's one of the finest showcases Charlton Heston ever had the opportunity to embrace, and he delivers a marvelous performance that surely ranks among his best work. Now, I'm not going to discredit anyone who sees another of this cinema titan's films as his most memorable offering, for I'm in agreement that he starred in better movies. Yet it's surely the part of Robert Neville that I consider his best role, despite any shortcomings with the film itself.
Additionally, it must be noted that this is one of three attempts Hollywood has made to bring Richard Matheson's timeless novel I Am Legend to the screen. Each attempt has fallen well short of living up to the book's lofty standards. Furthermore, only the 1964 version (The Last Man on Earth starring Vincent Price) was interested in being faithful to the material, but it didn't have the budget it needed to match Matheson's visionary masterpiece. I am a huge fan of the novel, and you can read more about it here in a "Top Vampire Movies and Books" piece I did for RVA Magazine. Am I disappointed that the other film versions have strayed from the material? Yes, but there's something about The Omega Man that makes me forgive the filmmakers for cutting their own path. I also enjoy the 2007 version of I Am Legend with Will Smith, but it's no more like the book despite sharing its title--and it's certainly no match for this wonky gem from 1971.
The opening reel is one of the best things about the picture, as the film begins with Heston cruising the deserted streets of Los Angeles in a cherry red Ford. There's something so eerie about a solitary figure driving through an empty city, and a bit of intrigue is added to the mix when he pauses just long enough to grab a machine gun and spray a nearby window where there may have been movement with a hail of lead. What follows is a unique series of bizarre sequences as Heston's lone survivor (or so he thinks) squares off against a clan of bloodthirsty mutant albinos known as "The Family." These strange enemies hide during the day while Neville rummages for supplies and works to achieve a cure for that which ails his adversaries. At night, Neville must barricade himself within his swank L.A. home and try to survive as The Family lays siege to his residence over and over again.
Throughout, Heston operates with an impressive passion for his craft, excelling in a complex role. Neville is desperate, fearsome, vulnerable, and also a bit mad. As such, the picture requires him to portray a man who is a hopeless lunatic at times, but who is also a rugged survivor, and finally, a man who emerges from the desperation and carnage around him as a selfless hero. He goes crazy, he guns down mutants, he makes love to Rosalind Cash, and he perishes in an attempt to save what remains of mankind. It's a huge role that would have capsized many a fine performer, but not Charlton Heston. He kills it.
His adversaries, the fiendish (and vaguely hippy-esque) members of The Family (who had to be at least partly inspired by the so-called "Manson Family" and their brutal exploits two years prior in 1969), are a fearsome crew. Led by Anthony Zerbe as Matthias, who is also seen as a news anchor in Neville's flashbacks of a world that had yet to be spoiled, they hide during the day and lust for blood--Robert Neville's blood in particular--during the night. Zerbe, as always, delivers the goods, setting an admirable standard for his co-stars who join him in bringing these spooky creatures to life.
The effects are serviceable enough. As a kid, The Family scared the hell out of me, and while the make-up is a bit dated by modern standards, it's still eerie enough to get the job done. The action is well-choreographed and there are some fine moments of suspense. While Matheson's novel was far more brisk, the plot for The Omega Man seldom falters and there are only a few lulls sprinkled throughout the 98 minute running time. The picture can be a bit overwrought, and Cash and the rest of the actors portraying the other human survivors who arrive late in the game have a hard time keeping up with Heston and Zerbe.
Boris Sagal did a nice job directing the picture and Ron Granier's work with the score is solid. The editing and cinematography are top-notch, and The Omega Man is definitely a fine example of the high-quality fare the elite studios used to churn out. I want to single out a sequence early in the film where Neville goes to a theater and watches Woodstock as a brilliant touch. Heston shines in this scene where a lonely man sees multitudes of people come together in celebration on the screen. Neville recites the lines verbatim as one subject of the documentary tries (and mostly fails) to explain the Woodstock experience. It's as close as Neville can get to joining in on the fun himself and thereby escaping his lonely and treacherous existence. It's simple yet powerful stuff, and seeing as how it arrives lumped in amid some fairly ludicrous sci-fi mayhem, it may surprise you.
In the end, my childhood fascination with the picture aside, I think it's fair to say that The Omega Man remains the best attempt to adapt I Am Legend. It's wildly dissimilar, far more absurd, and it exchanges the book's masterful (and incredibly cynical) ending for a far more optimistic (and yes, contrived) conclusion. Yet it is owned by Charlton Heston, who attacks the role, guns blazing, and elevates a far-fetched vision of an apocalyptic future into one of the more outlandish and captivating sci-fi yarns that you're apt to see.
Trivia:
In his autobiography, In the Arena, Heston writes that Rosalind Cash was bit apprehensive before shooting her love scene with him. "It's a spooky feeling," he recalls her saying, "to screw Moses."
Allegedly, Richard Matheson felt that the picture was so unlike his book that he wasn't at all bothered by the various changes. He saw it as a completely different tale.
Tim Burton has voiced his affection for The Omega Man more than once. He even went so far as to say that if he was stranded on a desert island, it's the kind of the movie he want with him to help pass the time in an interview held to promote his 2009 Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) exhibit.
Believe it or not, some scenes of the empty Los Angeles landscape that Neville inhabits were accomplished simply by shooting in the business district early on Sunday mornings, when the streets were mostly empty. This explains why it's possible to pick out a few random souls walking around in the background during some of the wide shots used to emphasize the main character's isolation.
The decision to exchange Matheson's vampires for mutant albinos is credited to screenwriter Joyce Corrington, who held a doctorate in chemistry and felt that mutants spawned by biological warfare were a more realistic choice.
Other Cult Classics from Dimension X c/o Land of Way:
Sssssss (1973)
Sorcerer (1977)
Vice Squad (1982)
Labels:
action,
albinos,
Charlton Heston,
classic,
Heston,
horror,
I Am Legend,
Manson,
Manson Family,
Matheson,
Moses,
mutants,
Richard Matheson,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
The Family,
The Omega Man,
vampires
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: I Am Legend (2007)
Right off the bat, I want to say that I'm a huge fan of the Richard Matheson novel that this movie is based on. The book is an absolute classic and you can check out a "Top Vampire Movies and Books" piece I did for RVA Magazine here for more on it. Suffice it to say that it's a work of fiction that I hold so near and dear to my heart that I shied away from this Will Smith vehicle for quite some time. Of course, I'm actually a big fan of Charlton Heston's The Omega Man from 1971 (also based on the book, and also a very loose interpretation of the material) as well as the more faithful (but cheaply made) Vincent Price version entitled The Last Man on Earth from 1964, so I couldn't avoid the most recent attempt at bringing this tale to screen forever. And you know what? I liked it. I honestly think it was probably a better picture than either of the previous versions to grace the silver screen, but I still favor The Omega Man. Will Smith does an awesome job in the 2007 version, but he's not quite in Heston's league. Smith is modern cinematic royalty, and it's close, but Heston was one of best ever and I preferred his take on the character of Robert Neville. Anyway, this most recent version of the film exchanges Matheson's vampires for CGI mutants with a powerful thirst for blood and Spider-Man's ability to run, jump, and climb walls. The CGI can be a little problematic, but the powerful (and heartbreaking) tale of Sam the heroic dog offsets any shortcomings so far as the effects are concerned. The plot zips along at a nifty pace and there are several rousing action scenes in the mix. There's also a compelling story and a worthy conclusion--a pair of them actually, as I thought the alternate ending featured on the Blu-Ray I watched was equally potent. Legendary? I think not, but definitely worth a watch. Just be sure to dig up a copy of The Omega Man if you like what you see.
Final Grade: B
Final Grade: B
Labels:
CGI,
Charlton Heston,
Heston,
horror,
I Am Legend,
Last Man on Earth,
Matheson,
Price,
Richard Matheson,
RVA,
RVA Magazine,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
smith,
spider-man,
The Omega Man,
Vincent Price,
Will Smith
Thursday, January 8, 2015
The Alien Anthology
The SuperFox (my wife) hooked me up with the Alien Anthology set during the holiday season, so I recently had a chance to watch all four of the original Alien films. I greatly enjoy the franchise, but mostly because of the strength of the first two entries. I always felt that Alien was a really good horror film, and I think of Aliens as a genuine masterpiece. Upon my first (and only) viewings of the third and fourth film prior to this endeavor, I found the third to be good but overly somber and the fourth to be total garbage. Would I view things differently upon a second viewing?
First off, I still rank the first two pictures the same way. Alien is a solid horror film, but it's probably not in my top ten. I love the talent involved, the atmosphere, and especially the cinematography, and it is surely a fantastic movie--but it isn't a great one, at least not in my humble opinion. Aliens is positively incredible. It's easily the best sci-fi/action picture of all time, and if you want to look at it solely as an action film, it might rule that list as well. It's tense, it's exciting, it's a lot of fun, and I just don't know that movies get much better than Aliens. I love it.
Now, Alien 3 is a different story. Talk about a buzzkill. The overly bleak nature of the piece is so much more evident if the picture is viewed right on the heels of Aliens. It can't help but suffer by comparison. Honestly, this time out, I found that I enjoyed Alien 3 far less than Alien Resurrection--and it's a much better movie. It's just such a downer. I'm trying to do this whole thing spoiler-free, but suffice it to say that elements of the plot that are disclosed in the opening reel drag the whole thing down, and it never gets any happier. The direction is fine, the action setpieces (few though they may be) are riveting, and there are a couple of likable characters in play, but the whole thing is a major downer. If Aliens is as much fun as you can have watching a movie, Alien 3 is aiming squarely at the other end of that spectrum.
So is Alien Resurrection any good? No, it's not. To be completely honest, it's rather awful. But hey, it is colorful, and a bit unpredictable, and the direction is genuinely unique. Despite a multitude of flaws, it's a lot of fun, and it has some incredibly creative sequences that are deserving of a better picture, but the plot is lacking and the closing reel is so bad that it's damn near offensive. Having said that, at least it isn't a total pisser like the third entry in the series.
The Anthology set itself is beautiful, and packed with value. It contains two versions of every feature and two discs full of bonus content. Anyone looking for the inside scoop on the Alien franchise will find all they could hope for and more included in this gorgeous set. All in all, I was greatly pleased, and any fan of sci-fi, horror, or action must spend some time with these movies. Of course, if it was up to me, the series would end with Aliens, and I may try to convince myself that Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection don't exist. I'm fairly confident that I won't ever view them again. but that's okay--I'll continue to rock with Ripley, Dallas, and the Space Marines for as long as I live.
First off, I still rank the first two pictures the same way. Alien is a solid horror film, but it's probably not in my top ten. I love the talent involved, the atmosphere, and especially the cinematography, and it is surely a fantastic movie--but it isn't a great one, at least not in my humble opinion. Aliens is positively incredible. It's easily the best sci-fi/action picture of all time, and if you want to look at it solely as an action film, it might rule that list as well. It's tense, it's exciting, it's a lot of fun, and I just don't know that movies get much better than Aliens. I love it.
Now, Alien 3 is a different story. Talk about a buzzkill. The overly bleak nature of the piece is so much more evident if the picture is viewed right on the heels of Aliens. It can't help but suffer by comparison. Honestly, this time out, I found that I enjoyed Alien 3 far less than Alien Resurrection--and it's a much better movie. It's just such a downer. I'm trying to do this whole thing spoiler-free, but suffice it to say that elements of the plot that are disclosed in the opening reel drag the whole thing down, and it never gets any happier. The direction is fine, the action setpieces (few though they may be) are riveting, and there are a couple of likable characters in play, but the whole thing is a major downer. If Aliens is as much fun as you can have watching a movie, Alien 3 is aiming squarely at the other end of that spectrum.
So is Alien Resurrection any good? No, it's not. To be completely honest, it's rather awful. But hey, it is colorful, and a bit unpredictable, and the direction is genuinely unique. Despite a multitude of flaws, it's a lot of fun, and it has some incredibly creative sequences that are deserving of a better picture, but the plot is lacking and the closing reel is so bad that it's damn near offensive. Having said that, at least it isn't a total pisser like the third entry in the series.
The Anthology set itself is beautiful, and packed with value. It contains two versions of every feature and two discs full of bonus content. Anyone looking for the inside scoop on the Alien franchise will find all they could hope for and more included in this gorgeous set. All in all, I was greatly pleased, and any fan of sci-fi, horror, or action must spend some time with these movies. Of course, if it was up to me, the series would end with Aliens, and I may try to convince myself that Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection don't exist. I'm fairly confident that I won't ever view them again. but that's okay--I'll continue to rock with Ripley, Dallas, and the Space Marines for as long as I live.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
David Arquette Dresses Down in a Big Way
Check out David Arquette:
This is a shot (my man strolling down the stairs in typical human attire leads me to believe this is a promotional shot and not a still from the feature) tied to his new sci-fi film, Orion. I'm closing this out by failing to guarantee that I'll be there to see this one on opening night. Or when it hits Blu-ray. Or Netflix.
Or basic cable.
I have a feeling I might just close my eyes if you bought a copy and tied me to a chair in the hopes of getting me to view this potential gem. Having said that, it will wind up being someone's favorite movie, so to each their own.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















e








