Oh shit, son! You have just entered another dimension, a dimension not only of text and pictures, but of madness. You have embarked on a journey into a lunatic's mind. Check your sanity at the door--you're in the Land of Way!
Showing posts with label classic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label classic. Show all posts
Monday, January 13, 2020
Powerful Pages - Pet Sematary by Stephen King (1983)
Powerful Pages - Pet Sematary by Stephen King (1983)
I started reading Stephen King novels when I was 8 years old. When I started on this voyage, it seemed like I would never run out of books from the maestro to devour. But, inevitably, at some point, I approached the finish line. I put Pet Sematary aside because I always wanted to have one last vintage yarn from Uncle Stevie to dig into. Decades passed. And the time came. I just had to give it a go. First off, I'm sure glad that I finally took the plunge; Pet Sematary is a demented masterpiece, and it is as entertaining as it is unspeakable. Secondly, this was probably a good one to set aside, for it is as dark and haunting as anything King has written. It is maybe as dark and haunting as anything I've ever read, and that puts it right up there with The Exorcist* and Lord of the Flies**. Pet Sematary is all kinds of heavy, and it puts the characters (a really likable family and a friendly neighbor of the highest degree) through all kinds of awful shit. And the whole time, you sense the storm brewing, and somehow knowing that these people will suffer in abhorrent ways makes them that much more endearing. I guess that makes Pet Sematary as much of a tragedy as it is a horror novel, and it does operate on a grand scale that it isn't altogether common within the genre. King dares to grapple with some of the most difficult questions we all face in this life, and his answers here are as brutal as they are blunt. At the same time, the prose is warm and inviting, and the book itself unwinds like a tale spun by that remarkable neighbor, good old Jud Crandall, a kindly soul with a gift for piquing our interest. This story is intriguing from the onset, and as the stakes rise and the tension mounts, it becomes savagely addictive. I turned pages and begged the main character to change course with considerable tenacity, though I knew to expect the very worse at every turn. And toward that end, King delivered. Oh man. He delivered in spades.
*Surprise! The scariest movie of all time sprang forth from a novel that is equally intense and frightening. Indeed, the book has additional depth and takes the startling premise even further.
**Fuck William Golding. Fuck Lord of the Flies. Simon's death may be the most traumatic aspect of my high school education, and that little episode in my life had trauma to spare. Also: fantastic book, hell of a writer. Highly recommended!
Final Grade: A+
Labels:
#books,
#death,
#fiction,
#horror,
#King,
#PetSematary,
#StephenKing,
1983,
80s,
books,
Church,
classic,
dark,
death,
fiction,
Gage,
horror,
Pet Sematary,
scary,
Stephen King
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Short Attention Span Review - Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker's Apocalypse (1991)
Short Attention Span Review - Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker's Apocalypse (1991)
If you love the cinema, you have probably seen Apocalypse Now and heard a little about the making of this visionary masterpiece. Apocalypse Now is one of those rare feats in the industry, a stupendous achievement where tales surrounding the lengths that the artists went to create something are almost as intriguing as the work itself. In 1991, Fax Bahr and George Hickenlooper put together this documentary that offers tremendous insight into that storied production. Deftly combining interviews with most of the key players and raw footage captured on set, Bahr and Hickenlooper allow us to feel like the proverbial fly on the wall while an audacious undertaking threatens to unravel at every turn. Not only that, but the cast and crew threaten to unravel as well, making this a gripping tale in and of itself. Hearts of Darkness is about people testing their boundaries. It's also a battle against the elements and a test of endurance. It's about faith and conviction, and it is also about desperation, and perhaps even madness. It's one thing to ponder a director who had taken the industry by storm dragging his cast and crew into the jungle to shoot a sprawling epic while in search of an appropriate conclusion. It's yet another to see the various challenges unfold, to listen in as Francis Ford Coppola struggles to find himself as much as he struggled to find that ending that would make the journey worthwhile. It is an inspiring peak behind the curtain that shows us an odyssey that could have yielded disastrous results, and it is both a tribute to passion and sheer lunacy that something so prolific was born of this fury and fire. Luck may have played a role as well. Regardless, Hearts of Darkness is a vivid documentary that is both enlightening and entertaining. It is surely must-see viewing for those who recognize Apocalypse Now as one of the boldest and most riveting movies ever made, but even someone who had never heard of that grim saga would probably enjoy Hearts of Darkness.
Final Grade: A
![]() |
| An unparalleled look at the making of a genuine classic, this documentary is a profound exploration of art on a grand scale. |
Wednesday, September 4, 2019
Short Attention Span Review - Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Short Attention Span Review - Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Blade Runner is a film that I cherish, and I avoided this belated sequel for some time. Honestly, I didn't think there was anything worthwhile left to say where this property is concerned, and I love the questions and discussion that the 1982 masterpiece from Ridley Scott generated. Last night, I decided to take a look at Blade Runner 2049 in spite of my misgivings. I'm not really sure why, and I admit that I fully expected to find myself at odds with the material. From the onset, however, I realized that while Denis Villeneuve may not have matched Scott's brilliance, he authored a dazzling spectacle of his own. The visuals are extraordinary, the sound is amazing, and the script is equally impressive. While it is a bit slow, the methodical approach serves the intricate plot well, and allows the viewer to bask in all the breathtaking artistry on display. It really is a treat for the eyes, with both the design elements and the special effects representing the best that the film industry has to offer. Mind-boggling stuff, peeps. The performances are just as compelling, with Ryan Gosling carrying the picture, while Harrison Ford is fully invested in a smaller role that gives the proceedings a strong center. Jared Leto's extremely creepy work as an icy villain also warrants praise, and Sylvia Hoeks is a veritable powerhouse as his devious vessel of destruction. Most importantly, like the original, Blade Runner 2049 grapples with difficult questions and big ideas--and it encourages us to explore many of the most important threads on our own. Less a sequel than another distinct story inolving a shared vision of the future and many of the same characters, it doesn't tarnish what came before in any way. In fact, I am shocked to admit that I feel that Blade Runner 2049 adds to this stirring landscape. The pace and the runtime are likely to present issues for some viewers, and many others will long for more action. This isn't for everyone, to be sure, but those who hope to discover invigorating science fiction ripe with dangerous ideas will find much to enjoy.
Final Grade: A
![]() |
| Dark and introspective, Blade Runner 2049 is a brooding opus that features some of the best effects you're apt to see. |
Labels:
#BladeRunner,
#movies,
#RIP,
#RIPRutgerHauer,
1982,
Blade Runner,
Blade Runner 2049,
classic,
electric sleep,
Ford,
Gosling,
Leto,
movies,
replicant,
Ridley Scott,
Rutger Hauer,
science fiction,
thriller
Friday, August 16, 2019
Fabulous Faves - Blade Runner (1982)
Fabulous Faves - Blade Runner (1982)
Blade Runner is a film that remains spellbinding better than thirty years after hitting the scene. It remains a thorough yet quizzical offering that paints a complex picture, exploring some epic questions with pain-staking attention to detail. Yet it leaves the viewer to ponder many of these questions, and that is what makes it so majestic. It has so many strengths, to include visionary director Ridley Scott's most creative work, one of Harrison Ford's best performances, and mind-boggling special effects. Yet I find this beloved film's most potent draw to be dear departed Rutger Hauer's stunning portrayal of one of the cinema's most compelling villains. Hauer's Roy Batty is as tragic as he is fearsome, and the actor owned the role. He brought subtlety and introspection to the table, and he also brought brute force and a fiendish zeal. He was explosive and yet utterly relaxed; it is a completely natural showing that displays remarkable theatrics. When Hauer recently passed and I paused to look back on his body of work, I couldn't stop thinking about his poignant demise in Blade Runner. That sequence is truly sublime, and it is merely one of the many vibrant flourishes that make this 1982 production so profound. All these years after being released, it continues to provide viewers with a fully realized escape into a stark and strangely hypnotic vision of a future that did not come to pass. It boasts incredible drama, excitement, and stimulation that lasts until the final frame--and beyond. Blade Runner remains a stunning achievement that surely ranks among the finest motion pictures ever made.
Final Grade: A+
Labels:
#BladeRunner,
#movies,
#RIP,
#RIPRutgerHauer,
1982,
80s,
action,
Blade Runner,
classic,
electric sleepBl,
Ford,
Harrison Ford,
movies,
replicant,
Ridley Scott,
Rutger Hauer,
science fiction,
thriller
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Short Attention Span Review: Flash Gordon (1980)
Short Attention Span Review: Flash Gordon (1980)
I don't think I can be objective here, but maybe I don't need to be. I don't really know, to be completely honest with you You see, I'm not sure that there is a greater paradox in the realm of the motion picture than Flash Gordon. It is entirely possible that this is a "so bad it's good" sort of movie. There are definitely a few bits at the very least that would have wound up on the cutting room floor if the powers that be were looking to create a genuine classic with this brazen affair. However, there is also a sense of majesty paired with some splendid entertainment value that elevates this colorful and quixotic gem. In terms of sheer enjoyment, it is hard to top, and despite some clunky performances and a few goofy moments courtesy of the FX or the plotting, it does many things amazingly well. The color palette is a true splendor, and the score is a genuine masterpiece courtesy of Queen, bolstered by a main theme that is nothing short of sheer perfection. The excitement is non-stop, and the stakes are incredibly high. The heroes are lovable and the villains are despicable, and anyone who doesn't smile while they partake of this feast for the senses is dead inside. And yet there are those wooden performances and those moments where you can't quite tell if the filmmakers are going for camp or simply missing the mark by a mile. It is cheeky. It is downright silly. And somewhere, deep down inside, your inner critic is bound to feel that the material is beneath you. But then it soars and despite your misgivings, you find yourself being blown away by all the energy and grandeur, and somehow the sappy plot gets under your skin. Then you're actually moved by this barrage of sight and sound that is a lot like a puppy: awkward, a little smelly, and 100% lovable. It's Flash Gordon. It could be terrible. It could be the greatest sci-fi adventure of all time. You're free to make your own call, but as for me, . . . well, it's the first movie I really remember seeing, at a drive-in no less. I have loved it for as long as I have loved the movies. Yes, it's true--I like Flash as much as Mark Wahlberg and Ted do. Maybe more.
Final Grade: A
Labels:
#Flash,
#FlashGordon,
#movies,
#sciencefiction,
#scifi,
#Ted,
1980,
80s,
action,
classic,
cult classic,
Flash,
Flash Gordon,
Gordon,
Max Von Sydow,
movies,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
Ted
Monday, July 30, 2018
Short Attention Span Review: A Quiet Place (2018)
Short Attention Span Review: A Quiet Place (2018)
For a film fanatic, there are few feelings so sublime as that sense of bliss that washes over you when you realize you are watching an instant classic. Sometimes this can be misleading, as it isn't uncommon for an epic set-up or some incredible filmmaking to break down at some point, but occasionally the filmmakers deliver the goods from start to finish. A Quiet Place is one of those flicks where things begin and end on a high note, with a series of high notes sprinkled in between for good measure. The pitch is simple but intriguing and new, and the execution is flawless. Truthfully, I can't think of anything that warrants criticism. The acting is sensational, with everyone in the small cast doing an amazing job of bringing their characters to life. It's hard to single anyone out, but Emily Blunt surely deserves special praise given her Oscar-worthy performance even if none of her co-stars lag too far behind her tour de force. The script is keen and insightful; it is stripped to the bare essentials, yet it contains incredible depth and completely fleshes out its vision. Co-star John Krasinski is a bit of a revelation as a director, and he nearly matches his wife with an invigorating performance. Few genres depend on a good score and sound effects as much as the horror genre, and the very concept of A Quiet Place demands an awful lot on those fronts--and the artists come through in spectacular fashion. The creature design is a big winner, the pacing and editing are on point, . . . there's just nothing to complain about here. There is a lot to marvel at, and viewers who journey to A Quiet Place will be swept away by a vivid sensation that will terrify and move them in equal measures. This is a fine example of the horror genre at its very best, as A Quiet Place is an amazing experience that easily stands as one of the best films we'll see this year--or any other year, for that matter.
Final Grade: A+
![]() |
| An inventive concept and excellent craftsmanship combine to yield an instant classic. A Quiet Place is not just a great horror film, it's a great film in general. |
Labels:
#AQuietPlace,
#horror,
#movies,
2018,
A Quiet Place,
Blunt,
classic,
creature,
creature feature,
Emily Blunt,
great,
horror,
horror films,
instant classic,
Krasinski,
monster,
monster movie,
movies,
new
Wednesday, July 4, 2018
Short Attention Span Review: Electra Glide in Blue (1973)
Short Attention Span Review: Electra Glide in Blue (1973)
I watched a rather unique film this weekend, and I'm pretty sure that it was an American classic. I had never heard of it before happening upon it by chance, and I'm not sure what drew me to it in the first place. Maybe it was that groovy title, Electra Glide in Blue. From the onset, two things were readily apparent: the craftmanship was sublime, and the subject matter was deep and open to interpretation. A captivating character study and a meditation on so many different things, to include ideals as opposed to reality, isolation, civic duty, machismo, and even the merits of peace in a violent world, ten different viewers would likely draw ten different conclusions from the picture. The cinematography was nothing short of superb, and while I greatly enjoyed the cast (in particular, star Robert Blake fully committed to the lead role and offered up a bravura performance as a result), the way the shots were framed and the powerful combination of riveting close-ups and compelling wide shots may have been the picture's greatest strengths. It was impossible to look away no matter how bleak the movie became, though there were flourishes of humor and excitement sprinkled throughout. The ending served as the perfect punctuation for a quizzical and startling film that worked for me on a great many levels. As with any movie of this ilk, I do think it would prove divisive for most. While I found it incredibly satisfying and worthy of repeated viewings, many would likely view it as too broad and ambiguous--or take offense at some of the conclusions they draw from it. Of course, I tend to think that a film that can provoke such reactions is often a rich find, and I am certainly glad that I took a little ride with Electra Glide in Blue.
Final Grade: A
![]() |
| Electra Glide in Blue deserves another look, and the juxtaposition of civility and brutality is as relevant now as ever. |
Labels:
#70s,
#America,
#cultclassic,
#movies,
70s,
America,
American,
American classic,
Blake,
classic,
cult,
cult classic,
cult hit,
Electra,
Electra Glide,
Electra Glide in Blue,
film,
movies,
review,
Robert Blake
Monday, December 4, 2017
Short Attention Span Review: Best of the Best (1989)
Short Attention Span Review: Best of the Best (1989)
I do this out of love, peeps. Writing this review feels a lot like baring my soul in some new and thoroughly uncomfortable way. Why? Well, because this cliched and entirely too emotional offspring of a kung fu flick cross-pollinated with a soap opera is most certainly a guilty pleasure of mine. Crafting this blog will require me to profess my undying love for a picture that is remarkably bad. As far as I'm concerned, Best of the Best is a case study in the rare art of getting everything wrong--and somehow getting it right. Yes, the plot finds room for every staple of both motion pictures about sports and plucky underdog tales in general. Yes, it shamelessly mines each of these tropes for every single ounce of melodrama. It mines many of them twice. Some of them may be mined a half-dozen times or more before everyone hugs it out at the weepy conclusion. Yes, Eric Roberts takes over-acting to new heights, playing his role with less restraint than we might expect from Bill Shatner and Wings Hauser--if they were shitfaced and engaged in a fierce competition to see who could get booted off the set first. Yes, the closing reel morality play is so overdone that it roughly equates to cooking your steak until it becomes jerky. All of these things are true (and I haven't even touched upon the glam-rock soundtrack or Eric's hair, dear lord) and yet it is both entertaining and touching in spite of its glaring flaws. Shit, much of the entertainment is reliant upon Eric's dedication to turning every other scene into an opportunity to work through the five stages of grief in one take. In terms of competence, originality, and believability, Best of the Best must be considered an abject failure. However, it bypasses the realm of "so bad it's good" filmmaking and somehow lands in "so bad it is marvelous" territory. Yeah, I'll stand by that. You'll marvel, all right. You may even cheer. You may cry a bit, doing your own Eric Roberts Lite routine, and you'll certainly feel like a dumbass for falling prey to this crap when that happens. Honestly, I love it. No shame, peeps. I'm going to bat for Eric Roberts like Mickey Rourke here. I would have given him the Oscar, no bullshit. His performance in Best of the Best leads me to believe that his acceptance speech would have been the greatest thing to happen in the history of time.
Final Grade: C+
![]() |
| Eric Roberts, man. Eric Fucking Roberts. Unbelievable. And I still wind up so invested in his character. If I was the only one who felt this way, I would chalk it up to mental illness. |
Labels:
#EricRoberts,
#kungfutreachery,
#movies,
1989,
bad,
Best of the Best,
classic,
Eric Roberts,
guilty pleasure,
karate,
kung fu,
kung fu flick,
mental illness,
movies,
so bad it's good,
sports,
sports movies
Monday, November 27, 2017
Short Attention Span Review: It Follows (2014)
Short Attention Span Review: It Follows (2014)
As I write this review, I can't help but wonder: when was the last time I watched a totally original horror film? I've seen a lot of good horror films over the years, but I may have to go all the way back to my discovery of giallo in the very heart of my adolescence for a similar revelation. It Follows is quite unlike anything I've ever seen--and it's scary as hell. Now, I know I'm a little late to the party here, but if you're like me and you've been sleeping on this one in spite of they hype, well, wake up! The hype is warranted. Creepy from the start, there's a wicked dreamlike vibe woven throughout that is decidedly unnerving. Fortunately, the stakes remain high, and this imaginative flair never causes the picture to become too whimsical to be taken seriously. It Follows is a dead serious live wire that aims to give the audience a major jolt. The score is damn near iconic, the performances are captivating, and the direction from writer and director David Robert Mitchell is precise and inventive in equal measures. Few things excite me as much as the discovery of a great horror film, and this is probably the best one I've seen since The Descent. Cool, terrifying, and fresh as hell--I may be so late that I almost missed the party, but I'm so glad I found time to enjoy this one. It Follows represents a wealth of imagination and a superb effort courtesy of everyone involved.
Final Grade: A
![]() |
| It Follows is built upon a kooky premise that can transform mundane shit like this old lady walking down the hallway into a terrible nightmare. |
Monday, November 9, 2015
Short Attention Span Review - Curse of the Demon (1957)
Atmospheric and tense, this notable chiller with a potent noir vibe is a delightful picture that remains engrossing. Dana Andrews does a nice job as a skeptical leading man who has come to England to expose a satanic cult leader as a fraud. Unfortunately, this endeavor goes awry when our wooden hero is cursed by the charismatic but twisted Doctor Karswell, who is expertly played here by Niall MacGinnis. MacGinnis steals the show and his performance would surely stand as the biggest strength of Curse of the Demon if not for Jacques Tourneur's splendid direction. The paranoia and the suspense that he generates throughout this twisted shocker are palpable, and despite a few hokey shots* of the titular menace, Tourneur's film is still a spooky outing that boasts several imaginative and frightening sequences. The parchment that dances in the wind and the grand finale are perhaps my favorite elements of this beloved cult classic, but there are other sequences of merit generously sprinkled throughout the picture. While it is treasured by many horror fans, it probably doesn't get the love that it deserves, and with that in mind I'm here to heartily recommend this creative tale of terror from 1957 to my readers.
*Allegedly, the shots of the demon were added by the producer against Tourneur's wishes. Tourneur reportedly wanted to allow the audience to imagine the fearsome fiend instead of showing it, and the overall tone of the picture lends this theory credence.
Final Grade: B
![]() |
| There are a few laughable shots in the mix, but much of the imagery presented in Curse of the Demon is still rather creepy. |
Labels:
#horror,
#movies,
black and white,
classic,
creepy,
cult,
curse,
Curse of the Demon,
demon,
demonic,
demons,
devil worship,
horror,
movies,
Night of the Demon,
satanic,
scariest,
scary,
spooky
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Top 20 Horror Novels - #5) I Am Legend by Richard Matheson (from 1954)
Not only am I ranking my Top 20 Horror Movies for you this October, but I'm doing likewise with the scary books that I hold near and dear. As with the movies that I'm discussing in that Top 20, I'm not attempting to rank these novels based on their place in pop culture, but rather their place in my heart. Isn't that sweet? Seriously, there are some fine books that didn't make the cut here because there just wasn't room, and there are definitely some well-regarded books that didn't make the cut because I don't really like them. That also means there are some personal favorites of mine on this list that you may not have heard of. If that's the case, I promise that I'll reward your trust with a gnarly tale if you give one of them a spin. Finally, I may have shortchanged some of the titans in the genre (hey there, Stephen King) as I didn't want to overload this list with titles by the same author, though Uncle Stevie did manage to score three direct hits on my list.
The list thus far:
#20) Amok by George Fox (from 1980)
#19) Manstopper by Douglas Borton (from 1988)
#18) Intensity by Dean Koontz (from 1995)
#17) The Terror by Dan Simmons (from 2007)
#16) The Snake by John Godey (from 1978)
#15) Son of the Endless Night by John Farris (from 1985)
#14) Rockinghorse by William W. Johnstone (from 1986)
#13) Vampire$ by John Steakley (from 1990)
#12) Falling Angel by William Hjortsberg (from 1978)
#11) Christine by Stephen King (from 1983)
#10) The Manitou by Graham Masterton (from 1975)
#9) At the Mountains of Madness by H.P. Lovecraft (from 1936)
#8) All Heads Turn When the Hunt Goes By by John Farris (from 1977)
#7) Hell House by Richard Matheson (from 1971)
#6) The Exorcist by William Peter Blatty (from 1971)
Top 20 Horror Novels - #5) I Am Legend by Richard Matheson (from 1954)
A case study in isolation and loneliness and a genre epic all rolled into one, this book packs a mean punch. Matheson has an incredible body of work, but this 1954 epic is his best offering. The tale concerns the last living man's woeful struggle to survive in a world that has been overrun by vampires. Haunting and insightful, Robert Neville’s gripping saga culminates with one of the most compelling endings in the history of storytelling. That’s high praise indeed, and it may explain why Hollywood has put this tale on film several times now without embracing the bravery and the finesse that bringing the conclusion to life would require. The clarity and the pace that define this work serve to provide readers with a stirring adventure that unfolds quickly. Matheson has always believed in shipping the freight, and I Am Legend is a fine example of his ability to paint a vivid picture without any unnecessary brushstrokes. Much like the other books I’ve featured on this list, I would highly recommend this title to any reader, regardless of their feelings on the horror genre. I Am Legend is a legendary book (forgive me) and that climax will stick with you forever.
Labels:
#books,
#fiction,
#Halloween,
#horror,
#LandofWay,
#novels,
#vampires,
best,
books,
classic,
fiction,
halloween,
horror,
I Am Legend,
novel,
Richard Matheson,
scary,
top,
vampires
Sunday, August 9, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: Silverado (1985)
For my money, it's hard to beat a great western, and Silverado is one of the best westerns that you're apt to see. Everything about this one is grand, to include the magnificent cast, the epic locations, the fabulous script, and the stellar direction. A big picture that deftly intertwines several gripping stories on the road to a corrupt town where all these stories come to a rousing conclusion, Silverado is a love letter to all the wonderful westerns that came before it. It's also a reminder that genres may rise and fall, but so long as a top-notch script and the right talent join forces, no genre is ever truly forgotten. The western may never be as important to the film industry as it once was, but it will always present the right people with an opportunity to tell a powerful story. That's precisely what director Lawrence Kasdan did with this vibrant gem that he penned alongside his brother, Mark. A good western can make adults feel all warm and fuzzy inside while encouraging their children to run around pretending that they're cowboys making a stand for all that is right. Silverado is precisely that kind of film, and as such it is just as adept at presenting us with sound characters facing difficult decisions as it is at offering up thrilling shootouts. There's also a lot of warmth and humor riding shotgun with the heroic antics that are the backbone of the western genre. Kevin Kline, Scott Glenn, Kevin Costner, and Danny Glover shine as the heroes, while Brian Dennehy makes for an excellent villain. Linda Hunt, Rosanna Arquette, Jeff Goldblum, and John Cleese are among the supporting cast, and Jeff Fahey makes an impression as a grimy henchman in one of his earliest roles. The movie is certainly not lacking for star power, but then I don't see where Silverado is lacking anything. A stunning example of what could be my favorite genre of film, this is a fantastic movie that I would heartily recommend to anyone.
Final Grade: A+
| There are numerous established stars playing robust parts in Silverado, and then there's my man Jeff Fahey hitting the scene and striking a chord as a sleazy deputy. |
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: Machete (2010)
I know, I know, I'm doing this backward. Yesterday I reviewed Machete Kills and today I'm reviewing the first Machete. I'm a writer, so funny things happen in my brain. Forgive me. Anyway, while the sequel brought some seriously silly sci-fi antics into play, Machete is an ode to those hardcore action movies of the 70s and 80s that made guys like Charlie Bronson and Sylvester Stallone superstars. While it takes the notion of a parody to such bizarre heights that it borders on being too ridiculous to engage the audience, it ultimately succeeds in providing viewers with a cheeky and exciting experience that is equal parts bonkers and badass. If you're looking for a genuine action film, look elsewhere--satire is as important to Machete as gratuitous violence and outrageous amounts of gore. Robert Rodriguez pushes the envelope at every turn, and he gets quality performances from everyone involved. Robert DeNiro appears to be having the time of his life, Don Johnson is great, and Jeff Fahey is fucking phenomenal. Michelle Rodriguez rocks, Lindsay Lohan is actually tolerable, and perhaps only Jessica Alba seems a bit out of place, though she is smoking hot and it's not like she's terrible or anything. Steven Segal is hilarious as the villain, giving us perhaps the funniest death scene of all time, and it truly feels like everyone in the cast had fun making this blood-soaked romp. The score is on point, the effects are appropriately cheesy, the gore is obnoxious, and Machete scores a direct hit for fans of this sort of material.
Final Grade: B
Final Grade: B
![]() |
| Danny Trejo is at his badass best in Machete. |
Labels:
#Machete,
#movies,
action,
cinema,
classic,
cult,
cult classic,
Danny Trejo,
DeNiro,
Don Johnson,
grindhouse,
Jeff Fahey,
Machete,
Michelle,
movies,
review,
reviews,
Robert Rodriguez,
Rodriguez
Thursday, May 7, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: The Shining (1980)
I'm a big fan of Stephen King and The Shining is one of his darkest and most powerful novels. My respect for the book initially kept me from appreciating this wonderful film from one the greatest directors ever, Stanley Kubrick. If I had written this review a decade ago, I may have given this one a "C" or worse. Truthfully, if one reads King's book and then views the film expecting a faithful adaptation, disappointment is on the horizon. Kubrick took the basic premise from the novel and did his own thing with it, making a great many substantial changes along the way. Yet time and my appreciation of quality filmmaking have dramatically softened my stance on this landmark horror movie from 1980. Despite taking a different approach to the material, Kubrick delivered one hell of a fright flick that is greatly enhanced by Jack Nicholson's most impressive performance. The energy and the menace that he brings to the role of Jack Torrance is legendary. I know some think he hammed it up a bit too much, but I can't criticize his work here. Who has seen this film and somehow managed to avoid quoting it at some point? Anyone? Okay, give me an example of a scene in the picture where Jack isn't entertaining as hell. Go ahead, I'll wait. No, it isn't a nuanced performance that plumbs the depths of an alcoholic's descent into madness, and I understand why that ticks some people off. Let's just not ignore the fact that it's a brazen take on a demented character that is incredibly intense and wildly compelling. Opposite Nicholson, Shelley Long also delivers the goods as Wendy, and it's her excellent portrayal of a battered wife, a role that is ripe with torment and misery, that serve to embellish Jack's reckless abandon and his demonic zeal. It's also this disparity that pulls the audience in, heightening the struggle taking place in the creepy hotel. Speaking of the Overlook--man, is this film atmospheric or what? The cinematography is amazing, the music is full of dread, and the sets are wonderful. The end result is an ominous and scary film bolstered by rich performances and a director who was a true master of his craft. It may not be faithful to the book, which is an iconic terror yarn, but this visionary film is also a legitimate masterpiece.
Final Grade: A
![]() |
| This is what you get when you make out with strange women in haunted hotels. |
Labels:
book,
books,
classic,
director,
horror,
Jack,
masterpiece,
movie,
movies,
Nicholson,
Overlook,
Shelley Long,
Stanley Kubrick,
Stephen King,
The Shining,
Torrance,
visionary,
Wendy
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: Conan the Barbarian (1982)
There are only a handful of movies that I enjoy as much as Conan the Barbarian. I'm a fan of Arnold, I'm a fan of action movies, and I'm a big fan of Robert E. Howard's mighty Cimmerian, so this shouldn't be breaking news. Yet I think that anyone who enjoys an entertaining and energetic film should be able enjoy this smash hit from 1982 whether they have an interest in any of those things or not. Expertly directed by John Milius, well-scripted, and bolstered by some truly fabulous sets, this is a remarkable motion picture. Yes, there are some considerable alterations to Howard's vision, but many of these changes benefit the movie and none of them detract from it. I have been a fan of this character for a great many years, and in my personal opinion, the differences that spring up in his adventures on the big screen, the printed page, and within the realm of comics have seldom diminished his charisma. Conan is such a rich creation that it's difficult to modify him to such an extent that he loses his luster, though later film efforts would succeed in doing just that. This stellar Schwarzenegger vessel is a real winner that may be the finest action yarn depicting a quest for vengeance that has ever been produced. The cast is magnificent and the action sequences are rousing, realistic, and impressive to behold--a daunting trifecta, to say the least. The plot is well-constructed and seldom has such an intriguing character been so free to roam. The poster doesn't lie, for we see Conan enslaved as a child, forced to become a pitfighter when he comes of age, and he later earns his keep as a thief before emerging as the warrior he is destined to become. Unlike many of the pictures that populate such fantastic realms, Conan the Barbarian isn't a whimsical effects show but rather a dark and gritty saga ripe with brutality and dismay. The score courtesy of Basil Poledouris is a vibrant masterpiece that only adds to the movie's incredible power. In fact, it may be my favorite score ever, and it's surely my favorite score by anyone other than John Carpenter. Director John Milius is a woefully underrated figure in the motion picture industry and Conan the Barbarian is surely his greatest achievement. I'm gushing a bit and I know it, but I just don't know how else to put it: if you truly want to know what is best in life, you must watch this movie.
Final Grade: A+ (it's better than Stygian Black Lotus)
Final Grade: A+ (it's better than Stygian Black Lotus)
![]() |
| As Conan, Arnold delivers perhaps the best prayer of all time. |
Conan's Prayer
Crom, I have never prayed to you before. I have no tongue for it.
No
one, not even you, will remember if we were good men or bad, why we
fought, or why we died. All that matters is that two stood against many.
That's what's important.
Valor pleases you, Crom, so grant me one
request. Grant me revenge.
And if you do not listen? Then to hell with
you!
Labels:
#Schwarzenegger,
action,
arnold schwarzenegger,
barbarian,
classic,
conan,
conan the barbarian,
Conan's prayer,
Crom,
Milius,
movie,
Oliver Stone,
revenge,
Schwarzenegger,
Thulsa Doom,
what is best in life
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: RoboCop (1987)
Earlier today I posted a review of the new RoboCop (I gave it a C) that you can read below. It only seemed logical to follow that up with a look at the original 1987 smash hit from visionary director Paul Verhoeven. Rest assured, good people, this one gets an A+. RoboCop is one of the best sci-fi/action mash-ups ever to grace the screen and I can't think of anything that it doesn't do well. Peter Weller leads an amazing cast that boasts wonderful performances from Nancy Allen, Ronny Cox, Kurtwood Smith, and Miguel Ferrer. Many of these talents offered up what was likely their best work in this excessively violent and riveting shoot 'em up with a lot of heart. It also benefits from a wealth of black humor and tremendous effects work. The story is engaging and provocative in equal measures and heightens the impact of all the bloody mayhem unfolding onscreen. Basil Poledouris provides the piece with what may be his second-best score (I'm hoping that no one reading this needs to be told what his finest score was) and the production team nailed every aspect of bringing this wild and visionary tale to life. I'm frequently amazed that this was such a major success, but that gives me hope for mankind. Apparently, there are lot of people out there who dig dark humor, gratuitous voilence, and buckets of gore. RoboCop is a true one-of-a-kind and it remains just as potent and daring now as it was then. Perhaps that's the biggest reason that I was so unimpressed with the reboot--RoboCop didn't need a paint job, and there was surely no need for a PG-13 RoboCop Lite. If you're in the mood for a badass movie about a badass cybernetic policeman cleaning up the mean streets of Detroit, look to 1987.
Final Grade: A+
Final Grade: A+
![]() |
| The original RoboCop is a special effects masterpiece. If you don't believe me, just ask this guy. |
Labels:
1987,
2014,
action,
classic,
Detroit,
excessive,
gore,
gratuitous,
movie,
movies,
new Robocop,
original,
Paul Verhoeven,
Peter Weller,
reboot,
review,
Robocop,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
violent
Thursday, March 19, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: Psycho III (1986)
Stop me if you've heard this one before: Alfred Hitchock's Psycho is a masterpiece. As is the case with many classics, it spawned sequels, most of which were relatively tame. However, the third picture in the series, directed by star Anthony Perkins, is a worthy follow-up. Now, it's nowhere near as good as the original, but that should come as no surprise. Still, it's an intriguing opportunity to revisit one of the horror genre's most iconic figures and the plot provides us with a few twists and turns during our third stay at the Bates Motel. Perkins had the art of playing Norman Bates down to a science and he also showed himself to be a fine director with this tense and disturbing thriller. Diana Scarwid is also impressive as a conflicted nun on the run who flees the convent and takes refuge at the Bates Motel. Bad call, right? Most importantly, Jeff Fahey is on hand as Duane, a seedy drifter who takes a job at the motel and proves to be almost as kooky and dangerous as Norman. Those who know me well know that I'm a big fan of Fahey and this performance is one of the reasons why. He adds so much to the movie and his character is a tremendous foil for Perkins. Their volatile relationship generates a wealth of tension in the third act of the picture. There are a few scenes in the mix that would have made Hitchcock proud, to include a choice bit where the sheriff casually scoops cubes out of an ice machine where a corpse is stashed while Norman watches, sweating bullets. There are a handful of gruesome demises and a lot suspense, but this isn't the type of picture that depends on cheap scares or gore. It's quirky but serious, twisted but deliberate, and it showcases a unique talent in a part he was born to play. Perkins also shows that he could direct everyone's favorite momma's boy as well and his Psycho III is a strange little thriller that delivers the goods.
Final Grade: B-
Final Grade: B-
![]() |
| Jeff Fahey damn near steals the show as Duane, the master of lamp foreplay. |
Monday, March 16, 2015
Short Attention Span Review: An American Werewolf in London (1981)
Final Grade: A+
![]() | |
| Everyone needs a best friend--unless they're dead and they keep showing up and demanding that you kill yourself. |
Monday, February 16, 2015
Cult Classics from Dimension X: The Omega Man (1971)
I can remember watching this as a small child. I know, I know, that explains a lot, right? I can also remember being fascinated by it even though my father insisted that it was lousy. As an adult, this is still one of the few movies that Pop and I disagree on. The Omega Man is a fantastic piece that is equal parts science fiction, horror, action, and thoughtful drama. Most importantly, it's one of the finest showcases Charlton Heston ever had the opportunity to embrace, and he delivers a marvelous performance that surely ranks among his best work. Now, I'm not going to discredit anyone who sees another of this cinema titan's films as his most memorable offering, for I'm in agreement that he starred in better movies. Yet it's surely the part of Robert Neville that I consider his best role, despite any shortcomings with the film itself.
Additionally, it must be noted that this is one of three attempts Hollywood has made to bring Richard Matheson's timeless novel I Am Legend to the screen. Each attempt has fallen well short of living up to the book's lofty standards. Furthermore, only the 1964 version (The Last Man on Earth starring Vincent Price) was interested in being faithful to the material, but it didn't have the budget it needed to match Matheson's visionary masterpiece. I am a huge fan of the novel, and you can read more about it here in a "Top Vampire Movies and Books" piece I did for RVA Magazine. Am I disappointed that the other film versions have strayed from the material? Yes, but there's something about The Omega Man that makes me forgive the filmmakers for cutting their own path. I also enjoy the 2007 version of I Am Legend with Will Smith, but it's no more like the book despite sharing its title--and it's certainly no match for this wonky gem from 1971.
The opening reel is one of the best things about the picture, as the film begins with Heston cruising the deserted streets of Los Angeles in a cherry red Ford. There's something so eerie about a solitary figure driving through an empty city, and a bit of intrigue is added to the mix when he pauses just long enough to grab a machine gun and spray a nearby window where there may have been movement with a hail of lead. What follows is a unique series of bizarre sequences as Heston's lone survivor (or so he thinks) squares off against a clan of bloodthirsty mutant albinos known as "The Family." These strange enemies hide during the day while Neville rummages for supplies and works to achieve a cure for that which ails his adversaries. At night, Neville must barricade himself within his swank L.A. home and try to survive as The Family lays siege to his residence over and over again.
Throughout, Heston operates with an impressive passion for his craft, excelling in a complex role. Neville is desperate, fearsome, vulnerable, and also a bit mad. As such, the picture requires him to portray a man who is a hopeless lunatic at times, but who is also a rugged survivor, and finally, a man who emerges from the desperation and carnage around him as a selfless hero. He goes crazy, he guns down mutants, he makes love to Rosalind Cash, and he perishes in an attempt to save what remains of mankind. It's a huge role that would have capsized many a fine performer, but not Charlton Heston. He kills it.
His adversaries, the fiendish (and vaguely hippy-esque) members of The Family (who had to be at least partly inspired by the so-called "Manson Family" and their brutal exploits two years prior in 1969), are a fearsome crew. Led by Anthony Zerbe as Matthias, who is also seen as a news anchor in Neville's flashbacks of a world that had yet to be spoiled, they hide during the day and lust for blood--Robert Neville's blood in particular--during the night. Zerbe, as always, delivers the goods, setting an admirable standard for his co-stars who join him in bringing these spooky creatures to life.
The effects are serviceable enough. As a kid, The Family scared the hell out of me, and while the make-up is a bit dated by modern standards, it's still eerie enough to get the job done. The action is well-choreographed and there are some fine moments of suspense. While Matheson's novel was far more brisk, the plot for The Omega Man seldom falters and there are only a few lulls sprinkled throughout the 98 minute running time. The picture can be a bit overwrought, and Cash and the rest of the actors portraying the other human survivors who arrive late in the game have a hard time keeping up with Heston and Zerbe.
Boris Sagal did a nice job directing the picture and Ron Granier's work with the score is solid. The editing and cinematography are top-notch, and The Omega Man is definitely a fine example of the high-quality fare the elite studios used to churn out. I want to single out a sequence early in the film where Neville goes to a theater and watches Woodstock as a brilliant touch. Heston shines in this scene where a lonely man sees multitudes of people come together in celebration on the screen. Neville recites the lines verbatim as one subject of the documentary tries (and mostly fails) to explain the Woodstock experience. It's as close as Neville can get to joining in on the fun himself and thereby escaping his lonely and treacherous existence. It's simple yet powerful stuff, and seeing as how it arrives lumped in amid some fairly ludicrous sci-fi mayhem, it may surprise you.
In the end, my childhood fascination with the picture aside, I think it's fair to say that The Omega Man remains the best attempt to adapt I Am Legend. It's wildly dissimilar, far more absurd, and it exchanges the book's masterful (and incredibly cynical) ending for a far more optimistic (and yes, contrived) conclusion. Yet it is owned by Charlton Heston, who attacks the role, guns blazing, and elevates a far-fetched vision of an apocalyptic future into one of the more outlandish and captivating sci-fi yarns that you're apt to see.
Trivia:
In his autobiography, In the Arena, Heston writes that Rosalind Cash was bit apprehensive before shooting her love scene with him. "It's a spooky feeling," he recalls her saying, "to screw Moses."
Allegedly, Richard Matheson felt that the picture was so unlike his book that he wasn't at all bothered by the various changes. He saw it as a completely different tale.
Tim Burton has voiced his affection for The Omega Man more than once. He even went so far as to say that if he was stranded on a desert island, it's the kind of the movie he want with him to help pass the time in an interview held to promote his 2009 Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) exhibit.
Believe it or not, some scenes of the empty Los Angeles landscape that Neville inhabits were accomplished simply by shooting in the business district early on Sunday mornings, when the streets were mostly empty. This explains why it's possible to pick out a few random souls walking around in the background during some of the wide shots used to emphasize the main character's isolation.
The decision to exchange Matheson's vampires for mutant albinos is credited to screenwriter Joyce Corrington, who held a doctorate in chemistry and felt that mutants spawned by biological warfare were a more realistic choice.
Other Cult Classics from Dimension X c/o Land of Way:
Sssssss (1973)
Sorcerer (1977)
Vice Squad (1982)
Labels:
action,
albinos,
Charlton Heston,
classic,
Heston,
horror,
I Am Legend,
Manson,
Manson Family,
Matheson,
Moses,
mutants,
Richard Matheson,
sci-fi,
science fiction,
The Family,
The Omega Man,
vampires
Thursday, January 8, 2015
The Alien Anthology
The SuperFox (my wife) hooked me up with the Alien Anthology set during the holiday season, so I recently had a chance to watch all four of the original Alien films. I greatly enjoy the franchise, but mostly because of the strength of the first two entries. I always felt that Alien was a really good horror film, and I think of Aliens as a genuine masterpiece. Upon my first (and only) viewings of the third and fourth film prior to this endeavor, I found the third to be good but overly somber and the fourth to be total garbage. Would I view things differently upon a second viewing?
First off, I still rank the first two pictures the same way. Alien is a solid horror film, but it's probably not in my top ten. I love the talent involved, the atmosphere, and especially the cinematography, and it is surely a fantastic movie--but it isn't a great one, at least not in my humble opinion. Aliens is positively incredible. It's easily the best sci-fi/action picture of all time, and if you want to look at it solely as an action film, it might rule that list as well. It's tense, it's exciting, it's a lot of fun, and I just don't know that movies get much better than Aliens. I love it.
Now, Alien 3 is a different story. Talk about a buzzkill. The overly bleak nature of the piece is so much more evident if the picture is viewed right on the heels of Aliens. It can't help but suffer by comparison. Honestly, this time out, I found that I enjoyed Alien 3 far less than Alien Resurrection--and it's a much better movie. It's just such a downer. I'm trying to do this whole thing spoiler-free, but suffice it to say that elements of the plot that are disclosed in the opening reel drag the whole thing down, and it never gets any happier. The direction is fine, the action setpieces (few though they may be) are riveting, and there are a couple of likable characters in play, but the whole thing is a major downer. If Aliens is as much fun as you can have watching a movie, Alien 3 is aiming squarely at the other end of that spectrum.
So is Alien Resurrection any good? No, it's not. To be completely honest, it's rather awful. But hey, it is colorful, and a bit unpredictable, and the direction is genuinely unique. Despite a multitude of flaws, it's a lot of fun, and it has some incredibly creative sequences that are deserving of a better picture, but the plot is lacking and the closing reel is so bad that it's damn near offensive. Having said that, at least it isn't a total pisser like the third entry in the series.
The Anthology set itself is beautiful, and packed with value. It contains two versions of every feature and two discs full of bonus content. Anyone looking for the inside scoop on the Alien franchise will find all they could hope for and more included in this gorgeous set. All in all, I was greatly pleased, and any fan of sci-fi, horror, or action must spend some time with these movies. Of course, if it was up to me, the series would end with Aliens, and I may try to convince myself that Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection don't exist. I'm fairly confident that I won't ever view them again. but that's okay--I'll continue to rock with Ripley, Dallas, and the Space Marines for as long as I live.
First off, I still rank the first two pictures the same way. Alien is a solid horror film, but it's probably not in my top ten. I love the talent involved, the atmosphere, and especially the cinematography, and it is surely a fantastic movie--but it isn't a great one, at least not in my humble opinion. Aliens is positively incredible. It's easily the best sci-fi/action picture of all time, and if you want to look at it solely as an action film, it might rule that list as well. It's tense, it's exciting, it's a lot of fun, and I just don't know that movies get much better than Aliens. I love it.
Now, Alien 3 is a different story. Talk about a buzzkill. The overly bleak nature of the piece is so much more evident if the picture is viewed right on the heels of Aliens. It can't help but suffer by comparison. Honestly, this time out, I found that I enjoyed Alien 3 far less than Alien Resurrection--and it's a much better movie. It's just such a downer. I'm trying to do this whole thing spoiler-free, but suffice it to say that elements of the plot that are disclosed in the opening reel drag the whole thing down, and it never gets any happier. The direction is fine, the action setpieces (few though they may be) are riveting, and there are a couple of likable characters in play, but the whole thing is a major downer. If Aliens is as much fun as you can have watching a movie, Alien 3 is aiming squarely at the other end of that spectrum.
So is Alien Resurrection any good? No, it's not. To be completely honest, it's rather awful. But hey, it is colorful, and a bit unpredictable, and the direction is genuinely unique. Despite a multitude of flaws, it's a lot of fun, and it has some incredibly creative sequences that are deserving of a better picture, but the plot is lacking and the closing reel is so bad that it's damn near offensive. Having said that, at least it isn't a total pisser like the third entry in the series.
The Anthology set itself is beautiful, and packed with value. It contains two versions of every feature and two discs full of bonus content. Anyone looking for the inside scoop on the Alien franchise will find all they could hope for and more included in this gorgeous set. All in all, I was greatly pleased, and any fan of sci-fi, horror, or action must spend some time with these movies. Of course, if it was up to me, the series would end with Aliens, and I may try to convince myself that Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection don't exist. I'm fairly confident that I won't ever view them again. but that's okay--I'll continue to rock with Ripley, Dallas, and the Space Marines for as long as I live.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



































